| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TheSirac
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2005 4:21 pm Post subject: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
 |
|
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Robert Perkis
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:57 am Post subject: Re: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
|
|
TheSirac wrote:
| Quote: |
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac
|
Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheSirac
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:42 am Post subject: Re: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
|
|
| Quote: | Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq
|
Dear Robert, thank you for the question...
No Books...or software, no website and mailing list...
Just for fun...
I like the mathematical approach to the lottery, and ALL is around the
coverings.
Only a passion for me.
There're a lot of things where investigating may be interesting...
Sincerely
Sirac
"Robert Perkis" <[email protected]> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:[email protected]...
| Quote: |
TheSirac wrote:
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac
Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TheSirac
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:42 am Post subject: Re: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
|
|
Dear Nan, thank you for the same question...
No Books...or software, no website and mailing list...
Just for fun...
I like the mathematical approach to the lottery, and ALL which is around the
coverings.
Only a passion for me.
There're a lot of things (about Lottery) where investigating may be
interesting...
Sincerely
Sirac
"nan" <[email protected]> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:[email protected]...
| Quote: | I THOUGHT the same.
Robert Perkis wrote:
TheSirac wrote:
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac
Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nan
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:42 am Post subject: Re: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
|
|
You call me Dear,awww,I am really feeling good.You are a girl,must be?I
am turning to bi or what,lol
anyway,share that passion with me too,as the covermaster isn't helping
too much.
TheSirac wrote:
| Quote: | Dear Nan, thank you for the same question...
No Books...or software, no website and mailing list...
Just for fun...
I like the mathematical approach to the lottery, and ALL which is
around the
coverings.
Only a passion for me.
There're a lot of things (about Lottery) where investigating may be
interesting...
Sincerely
Sirac
"nan" <[email protected]> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:[email protected]...
I THOUGHT the same.
Robert Perkis wrote:
TheSirac wrote:
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac
Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nan
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:43 am Post subject: Re: C(65,6,2,2)<142 (139 Minimum) Who can cover that? |
|
|
I THOUGHT the same.
Robert Perkis wrote:
| Quote: | TheSirac wrote:
Today i propose an interesting Covering for
C(65,6,2,2)=139 Minimum Possible
Great if you reach 139-140 Blocks (I've reached 148)
Who can improve it?
Thanks very much to anyone which will post a better covering...
Please post ALL blocks.
With Sincere Appreciation
Sirac
Sirac, is this just for fun or is something being done
with the improved designs such as a book or repository
or software? Robert Perkis / r.g.l.faq |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
