MollysPoker.com

[lottoarchitect]

Well, today I made another record I think. Previous bound was 31, now
new bound set to 30. I'll try to see if I can reduce it even more.

I don't know what to say really... 3 WR wheels in 2 weeks is too
much...or not? :)

cheers
lottoarchitect

[Musa]

This one ????

14,6,4,5
30
1,2,3,4,10,11
1,2,4,8,13,14
1,2,5,8,9,11
1,2,6,7,8,10
1,2,6,11,12,14
1,2,7,9,11,13
1,3,4,6,7,13
1,3,4,9,12,14
1,3,5,11,12,13
1,3,6,9,10,12
1,4,5,7,11,14
1,4,6,9,10,14
1,5,7,8,9,13
1,5,8,10,12,14
2,3,5,6,13,14
2,3,5,7,10,14
2,3,7,8,9,12
2,4,5,6,7,12
2,4,5,10,12,13
2,4,8,9,13,14
2,6,9,11,12,14
3,4,5,6,8,9
3,4,7,9,10,13
3,6,7,8,11,14
3,8,10,11,13,14
4,5,7,9,11,14
4,6,8,11,12,13
4,7,8,10,11,12
5,6,9,10,11,13
7,9,10,12,13,14

"lottoarchitect" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

[lottoarchitect]

No, its different

[Colin Fairbrother]

Musa

Yours is a 3 if 6 in 14. LottoArchitect's is a 4 if 5 in 14.

Colin
www.lottoposter.com

[lottoarchitect]

Musa's wheel is a 14,6,4,5=30 as well.

[Marco]

There used to be one super specialist (Ion) in this
newsgroup.
Then it was quiet for a while, and now we have two;
"lottoking" and Colin Fairbrother.


"Colin Fairbrother" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

[Jack Ricci]

There must be a lotto conspiracy somewhere!...but that department was
acclaimed by another member.

LottoHackJack

"Marco" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

[Lottoking]

Come to my website.I have pretty big advantage.
1.I know both Chinese and English lottery knowledge.
2.Only I have all the digital wheels.
3.Only I offer free online pick3-pick7 system.
4.Only I offer lottery investment project.
Marco wrote:

[Colin Fairbrother]

Marco

Had a look - couldn't find any previous contribution by you. Gather you must
be a filterologist who realises his life has been a total waste of time for
the past 15 years. My suggestion for someone like yourself is not to delay -
there's no point, just top yourself off and maybe a tree or something worth
while will live longer. Never know you may do some good by fertilising it.

I stand by what I said and my intention was to be helpful.

"Yours is a 3 if 6 in 14. LottoArchitect's is a 4 if 5 in 14."

Something wrong with that then tell me?

Your intention was to convey a witty remark. Marco, Marco - that is not
possible with a sole handicapped brain cell.

Apart from that sod off you loser, fuckwit, moron and zombie.

I feel better now!

Colin
www.lottoposter.com

[Colin Fairbrother]

Marco

Had a look - couldn't find any previous contribution by you. Gather you must
be a filterologist who realises his life has been a total waste of time for
the past 15 years. My suggestion for someone like yourself is not to delay -
there's no point, just top yourself off and maybe a tree or something worth
while will live longer. Never know you may do some good by fertilising it.

I stand by what I said and my intention was to be helpful.

"Yours is a 3 if 6 in 14. LottoArchitect's is a 4 if 5 in 14."

Something wrong with that then tell me?

Your intention was to convey a witty remark. Marco, Marco - that is not
possible with a sole handicapped brain cell.

Apart from that sod off you loser, fuckwit, moron and zombie.

I feel better now!

Colin
www.lottoposter.com

[Colin Fairbrother]

Marco

Yes it is also a 4 if 5 in 14 as LottoArchitect says. Note that is all he
said - it's called being courteous. He previously said it was different.
Logic says if I accept that and quickly test it and find it's a 3 if 6 in 14
then that's it.

So, maybe you go back to sleep for a few months and recover from that big
effort in wasted mental energy.

In a few months I look forward to your next snipe at mental superiors. Yes,
I would have to admit Fran got a handfull of brain cells more than you.

As for Ion he's given up the good fight. In the normal course of things I
would sooner be a Goliath rather than some puny, pusillanimous prick like
you or him with a fucking slingshot.

I feel even better now. Go on Fran, you have a go at him. Call him a sissy
or something.

Colin

[Marco]

Unfortunatly, you can't find any previous contribution,
because I have been searching:

"The Truth and Nothing but the Truth about Lotto Systems"
(author: Colin Fairbrother)

for over 20 years.

It's amazing, finally I found it on Colin's site.
Oh, I'm so happy. Thank you, you are a big genius.

Thanks especialy for the words:

"MOTHER OF ALL WHEELS"

I can't believe that the "Wheelie People" hide
the truth from us.
Colin, why do "Wheelie People" hide that ?

And then the strange Bulgarian ( dr. Iliya Bluskov)
published book with systems before he read
Colin Fairbrother's "TRUTH" about lotto and systems.
It's was very "stupid" from strange Bulgarian.

Hm, Colin the genius, one question, do you have permission
to spread Bluskov's systems?

Colin wrote:

Some of the Pick 6 Abbreviated Wheels available to
Lottery Post Platinum members are based on the hand-crafted,
mathematically-minimal lottery wheels constructed by
Iliya Bluskov in his book Combinatorial Lottery Systems
(Wheels) with Guaranteed Wins. Several of the wheels offer
significant reduction in the number of tickets that must be
played to guarantee a win. For example, Gail Howard's
System #513 (4if5of20) has a minimum purchase of 216 tickets,
whereas the Lottery Post 4if5of20 Abbreviated Wheel
(created by Bluskov) only requires 145 tickets to be purchased -
a reduction of 66 tickets for the same guarantee!

Marco.

PS.

People, please read this Colin's realy genius article:

The Truth and Nothing but the Truth about Lotto Systems

A big thing is made of Guarantees by the Wheelie People.
What they don't tell you and very conspicuously hide is
that the MOTHER OF ALL WHEELS, the one with the MOST
GUARANTEES is THE FULL WHEEL. For those of you that think
Wheels are something that came along after our cave man
days to enable us to do humanitarian things like attaching
long knifes to horse drawn carts so that you could cut the
legs out from underneath your enemy, well, you're wrong.

According to the namesake of the Australian Prime Minister,
she who claims to have popularised the term after ceasing to
be a Lottery Magazine journalist and being introduced to a
strange Bulgarian (How would I know if it was in the middle
of the night?) who was down on his luck after spending all
his money on publishing a little book with tables, it is the
magic elixir for winning Lotto. Now, like most get rich
schemes, you know the pretty boys with the saccharine smiles
and gift of the gab, it makes more money for the promoter
than the recipients of this road-map to riches. The tables,
by the way, basically are derived from the Full Wheel by
shimmying off some of the guarantees.

Feast your eyes on the guarantees for a Full Wheel for a
6/49 Lotto. If anyone wants a table for Lotto Games with one
or two bonuses, just ask.
=================================================


"Colin Fairbrother" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

[Colin Fairbrother]

So, who holds the record - LottoArchitect or Musa?

Makes my point about Copyright (and first to set a record) and having it
independently recorded with date and time stamp even more relevant.

Colin
www.lottoposter.com

[lottoarchitect]

Jack Ricci,

indeed, anyone qualified enough can make the same world record wheel,
using theory or other tools. The record is registered to the first one
to find a better wheel, this is unquestionable.
One question arise here regarding copyrights:
Assume that a new record wheel derives from the covering theory/other
method available to public. As covering theory belongs to anyone, then
definitely, each one of us can produce the same wheel, applying this
theory/tool. Does this violate any laws or copyrights? If it does, then
we are not allowed to apply any covering theory and just 1-2 persons in
this world, have the exclusive right to use covering theory (perhaps
those who investigate covering theory and find new laws/equations).
Does this makes sense? Is covering theory patended somehow, where we
have to purchase exclusive rights to use it?

Jack Ricci wrote:

[Jack Ricci]

It is my opinion only, that anyone can reach and hold a world record in
this " wheeling " field, but can probably not obtain a copyright on the
results that were obtained using the same or similar formulae, programs,
mechanisms, tools, apparatus or mathematics to achieve those same or better
results.

It appears that most of the records here in rgl were achieved using
faster machines as they became more available and affordable, and spending
more and more hours working with or refining previously written software to
perfect the same end- product.

Does that qualify as copyright material? I suspect anyone could write a
book or article and use the same wheel or wheel criterion obtained from
anywhere, no matter who wrote it, because the same results are reproducible
by more than just one person using the same methods to better the wheel. It
makes sense that the programs written to achieve those wheel goals is
probably copyrightable.

Copyright laws vary considerably in different countries, so a
bottom-feeder ( lawyer ) may need to be employed to clarify any
misunderstandings that may arise in these matters. Sorry to offend any
family members that are lawyers. My brother is one, and I razz him
constantly about it He also thinks I'm nuts for buying lottery
tickets...oh well...

LottoHackJack

"Colin Fairbrother" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...